People v. Womack

245 A.D.2d 148, 665 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13036
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Womack. Read the opinion of the Court — 229 A.D.2d 304

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.), rendered April 14, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 8 years to life and imposing a mandatory surcharge, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim concerning the mandatory surcharge should be raised in the sentencing court pursuant to a motion for re-sentencing (People v Rada, 160 AD2d 552). Nonetheless, defendant failed to establish that the surcharge worked an unreasonable hardship on him or his family (supra). Furthermore, defendant’s claim is premature since he may move therefor upon his release from prison (People v Velasquez, 198 AD2d 25, lv denied 82 NY2d 932). Concur—Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Womack, 245 A.D.2d 148, 665 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13036 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 148 (People v. Womack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rada
160 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Velasquez
198 A.D.2d 25 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)