People v. Womack
688 N.E.2d 1034, 90 N.Y.2d 974, 665 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4804
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (229 AD2d 304), noting additionally that the defendant’s appellate delay contention is not a matter properly presented to this Court (see, CPL 470.15 [1]; 470.35 [2] [a]).
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Cipaeick and Wesley.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Womack, 688 N.E.2d 1034, 90 N.Y.2d 974, 665 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4804 (N.Y. 1997).
688 N.E.2d 1034 (People v. Womack) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sofo
159 N.Y.S.3d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. James
2019 NY Slip Op 1708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
People v. Blacks
2017 NY Slip Op 6186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
People v. Onikosi
140 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Bullock
136 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Silverstri
48 Misc. 3d 810 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 2015)
People v. McLeod
281 A.D.2d 325 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Valentin
184 Misc. 2d 942 (New York Supreme Court, 2000)
People v. Martinez
268 A.D.2d 354 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Hernandez
268 A.D.2d 344 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Womack
263 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)