People v. Wolz
This text of 1 A.D.2d 622 (People v. Wolz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Braslow, J.), dated August 15, 2002, which granted the respondent’s motion to amend the trial transcript.
[623]*623Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
No separate appeal lies from the County Court’s order correcting the trial minutes (see People v McGoldrick, 284 App Div 978 [1954]; CPL 450.10, 450.15). The appropriate remedy to review the order and amended transcript was to seek leave to serve a supplemental brief on the appeal of the conviction (see People v Wolz, 300 AD2d 606 [2002]), or move for leave to reargue (see CPL 470.50). Altman, J.P, Goldstein, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 622, 767 N.Y.S.2d 637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wolz-nyappdiv-2003.