People v. . Wolter

New York Court of Appeals

People v. . Wolter

94 N.E. 1097, 201 N.Y. 523, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1291

DecidedFebruary 9, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 94 N.E. 1097 (People v. . Wolter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. . Wolter, 94 N.E. 1097, 201 N.Y. 523, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1291 (N.Y. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This motion for judgment of affirmance by default, in consequence of the inexcusable delay of counsel for the defendant in bringing the appeal to argument, will bo denied for the present in order to afford them a still further opportunity to discharge their duty in the premises. The motion may be renewed, however, by the district attorney unless counsel for the defendant shall have filed the necessary papers and briefs within forty days from this date, which time is allowed for that purpose. In the event of a renewal of this motion being necessary the district attorney will furnish the court with a copy of the judgment roll and the original stenographer’s minutes, and the court will take such steps as may then be necessary, either by the assignment of new counsel or otherwise, to protect the interests of the defendant and at the same time those of the public.

Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook, Chase and Collin, <TJ., concur ; IIaight, J., concurs in result.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This motion for judgment of affirmance by default, in consequence of the inexcusable delay of counsel for the defendant in bringing the appeal to argument, will bo denied for the present in order to afford them a still further opportunity to discharge their duty in the premises. The motion may be renewed, however, by the district attorney unless counsel for the defendant shall have filed the necessary papers and briefs within forty days from this date, which time is allowed for that purpose. In the event of a renewal of this motion being necessary the district attorney will furnish the court with a copy of the judgment roll and the original stenographer’s minutes, and the court will take such steps as may then be necessary, either by the assignment of new counsel or otherwise, to protect the interests of the defendant and at the same time those of the public.

Cullen, Ch. J., Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hisoook, Chase and Collin, <TJ., concur ; IIaight, J., concurs in result.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 N.E. 1097, 201 N.Y. 523, 1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wolter-ny-1911.