People v. Wolm

49 A.D.3d 1286, 852 N.Y.2d 890

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a plea of guilty of course of sexual conduct against a child in the first degree (Penal Law former § 130.75 [a]) and sexual abuse in the second degree (§ 130.60 [2]). The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to Supreme Court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Conway, 43 AD3d 635 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 990 [2007]), as well as his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Dupont, 292 AD2d 872 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 650 [2002]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Lunn, Fahey, Eeradotto and Fine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wolm, 49 A.D.3d 1286, 852 N.Y.2d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 1286 (People v. Wolm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Conway
43 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Dupont
292 A.D.2d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)