People v. Wolfe

181 N.Y.S.3d 496, 2023 NY Slip Op 00583
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 2023
Docket939 KA 22-00119
StatusPublished

This text of 181 N.Y.S.3d 496 (People v. Wolfe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wolfe, 181 N.Y.S.3d 496, 2023 NY Slip Op 00583 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Wolfe (2023 NY Slip Op 00583)
People v Wolfe
2023 NY Slip Op 00583
Decided on February 3, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 3, 2023 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, CURRAN, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.

939 KA 22-00119

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

THOMAS E. WOLFE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


ROBERT M. GRAFF, LOCKPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BRIAN D. SEAMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOCKPORT (THOMAS H. BRANDT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Matthew J. Murphy, III, J.), rendered November 18, 2021. The judgment convicted defendant upon a plea of guilty of assault in the second degree and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [2]) and attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 130.50 [1]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid and that his sentence is unduly harsh and severe. Even assuming, arguendo, that the waiver of the right to appeal is invalid, we perceive no basis in the record for us to exercise our power to modify the sentence as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [b]).

Entered: February 3, 2023

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431
§ 120.05
New York PEN § 120.05

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 N.Y.S.3d 496, 2023 NY Slip Op 00583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wolfe-nyappdiv-2023.