People v. Wolcott

19 A.D.3d 944, 797 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7229
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wolcott. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 A.D.3d 774

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered September 22, 2003, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Following her conviction of robbery in the third degree and perjury in the first degree, defendant was sentenced to time served in jail and concurrent five-year terms of probation. Thereafter, defendant was charged with violating the terms of her probation by using cocaine and failing to enter a substance abuse treatment program. She pleaded guilty to violating her probation and it was revoked. She was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to 1 to 3 years in prison, with a recommendation for shock incarceration. She now appeals.

Defense counsel has requested to be relieved of his assignment on the basis that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Based upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. Accordingly, the judgment is [945]*945affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wolcott, 19 A.D.3d 944, 797 N.Y.S.2d 322, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

19 A.D.3d 944 (People v. Wolcott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Stokes
744 N.E.2d 1153 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
People v. Cruwys
113 A.D.2d 979 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)