People v. Witherspoon
119 A.D.3d 879, 989 N.Y.S.2d 381
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 23, 2014·No. 2013-00953·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
-Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Cyrulnik, J.), imposed December 17, 2012, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.
Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.
The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255-257 [2006]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Witherspoon, 119 A.D.3d 879, 989 N.Y.S.2d 381 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
119 A.D.3d 879 (People v. Witherspoon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Eric P.
135 A.D.3d 882 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Knotts
130 A.D.3d 943 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)