People v. Witherspoon
This text of 105 A.D.2d 1066 (People v. Witherspoon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s statements were voluntary and not, as defendant asserts, improperly induced by misleading police comments (People v Tarsia, 50 NY2d 1; People v Yerdon, 51 AD2d 875; People v Rittenhouse, 37 AD2d 866). Additionally, since defendant failed to raise a factual issue regarding a violation of his Miranda rights by the arresting officers, there was no burden on the People to produce those officers at the suppression hearing (cf. People v McGregor, 84 AD2d 610). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe County Court, Mark, J. — burglary, third degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O’Donnell, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
105 A.D.2d 1066, 482 N.Y.S.2d 632, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 21145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-witherspoon-nyappdiv-1984.