People v. Winston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Winston

158 A.D.2d 565, 551 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1745

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[566]*566The defendant voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to seek appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motions which were to suppress statements, identification testimony, and physical evidence as a condition of the plea agreements (see, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, cert denied 423 US 873; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678). As the only issues raised by the defendant on this appeal concern the suppression court’s ruling, we do not reach them (see, People v Smith, 133 AD2d 864). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[566]*566The defendant voluntarily and knowingly waived his right to seek appellate review of the denial of those branches of his omnibus motions which were to suppress statements, identification testimony, and physical evidence as a condition of the plea agreements (see, People v Williams, 36 NY2d 829, cert denied 423 US 873; People v Roberts, 152 AD2d 678). As the only issues raised by the defendant on this appeal concern the suppression court’s ruling, we do not reach them (see, People v Smith, 133 AD2d 864). Thompson, J. P., Lawrence, Kunzeman and Balletta, JJ., concur.

People v. Winston, 158 A.D.2d 565, 551 N.Y.S.2d 841, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1745 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

158 A.D.2d 565 (People v. Winston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related