People v. Winslow

31 A.D.2d 561, 294 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2989
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Winslow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Winslow, 31 A.D.2d 561, 294 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2989 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the County Court of Schenectady County, entered April 3, 1968, which denied, without a hearing, an application in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a judgment convicting defendant of the crime of burglary in the third degree. The defendant was convicted upon his plea of guilty on August 15, 1967. The defendant alleges in his petition that his assigned trial counsel failed to advise him of his right to appeal under section 517 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. An affidavit submitted by defendant’s trial counsel states that, after the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, he advised the defendant that he had a right to appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress. However, there is no statement that defendant’s attorney advised him of his right to appeal from the conviction upon his plea of guilty. An order denying a motion to suppress evidence in a criminal case may be reviewed only on appeal from a judgment of conviction rendered upon a verdict or a plea of guilty. (People v. Rivera, 20 N Y 2d 669; People v. Merz, 20 A D 2d 918; Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c.) The defendant’s petition raises a sufficient issue of fact concerning whether counsel advised him of his right to appeal so as to require a hearing. “ Counsel assigned by the court to defend an accused is under a duty in case of conviction to advise his client of his right to appeal, and file timely notice of appeal if requested to do so.” (People v. Garrow, 30 A D 2d 618.) Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and matter remitted to the County Court of Schenectady County for a hearing. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Scott
93 Misc. 2d 1074 (New York Supreme Court, 1978)
People v. Richberg
56 A.D.2d 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 561, 294 N.Y.S.2d 451, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-winslow-nyappdiv-1968.