People v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Winkler

53 A.D.2d 880, 385 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13711

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 6, 1976·Published

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both imposed February 19, 1976, the sentences being concurrent 90-day terms in the New York City Correctional Institution for Men. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing them to concurrent periods of three-year probation. Case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In our opinion, defendant should have been sentenced to periods of probation. Margett, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both imposed February 19, 1976, the sentences being concurrent 90-day terms in the New York City Correctional Institution for Men. Sentences modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing them to concurrent periods of three-year probation. Case remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In our opinion, defendant should have been sentenced to periods of probation. Margett, Acting P. J., Damiani, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

People v. Winkler, 53 A.D.2d 880, 385 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13711 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

53 A.D.2d 880 (People v. Winkler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.