People v. Winkler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Winkler

50 A.D.2d 912, 377 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 29, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 912 (People v. Winkler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Winkler, 50 A.D.2d 912, 377 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 4, 1975, convicting him of criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for proceedings to direct defendant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50, subd 5). We find defendant’s guilt to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.. We have examined defendant’s [913]*913remaining arguments and find them to have no merit. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Margett, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 4, 1975, convicting him of criminal sale of a dangerous drug in the third degree, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for proceedings to direct defendant to surrender himself to said court in order that execution of the judgment be commenced or resumed (CPL 460.50, subd 5). We find defendant’s guilt to have been established beyond a reasonable doubt.. We have examined defendant’s [913]*913remaining arguments and find them to have no merit. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Margett, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 912, 377 N.Y.S.2d 570, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-winkler-nyappdiv-1975.