People v. Wingate

233 A.D.2d 349, 649 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11529
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wingate. Read the opinion of the Court — 225 A.D.2d 1085

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered October 5, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and (2) a judgment of the same court (Kohm, J.), rendered June 12, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Bracken, J. P., Copertino, Joy, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wingate, 233 A.D.2d 349, 649 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11529 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 349 (People v. Wingate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)