People v. Windus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Windus

188 A.D.2d 574, 591 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 14, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 188 A.D.2d 574 (People v. Windus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Windus, 188 A.D.2d 574, 591 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant [575]*575from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered February 6, 1992, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the knowledge that he would be denied youthful offender treatment, and did not seek to withdraw his plea before sentence was imposed. He thereby waived his present contention that the court improperly denied him youthful offender treatment (see, People v Valle, 163 AD2d 441; People v Belsito, 130 AD2d 583; People v Polansky, 125 AD2d 342). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant [575]*575from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.), rendered February 6, 1992, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the knowledge that he would be denied youthful offender treatment, and did not seek to withdraw his plea before sentence was imposed. He thereby waived his present contention that the court improperly denied him youthful offender treatment (see, People v Valle, 163 AD2d 441; People v Belsito, 130 AD2d 583; People v Polansky, 125 AD2d 342). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

188 A.D.2d 574, 591 N.Y.S.2d 368, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-windus-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack