People v. Winchell

7 Cow. 160
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Cow. 160 (People v. Winchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Winchell, 7 Cow. 160 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1827).

Opinion

Curia.

The English practice is spoken of, in their books, as well settled under this statute. The recognizance cannot be forfeited,, unless rules to try are taken against the defendant. He is then bound to give notice of trial. But our practice is different. The defendant is '^obliged to proceed to trial at the circuit of course, without waiting for any rule, either to be entered in the common rule book, or [164]*164made on motion m court. He must go down, upon the , . . . . , , ’ f ot his recognizance, to the next circuit; and the cause mugt tkere pg heard jn the ordinary way, as criminal causes are a^ oyer and terminer. The time of the circuit is made public; and the defendant must take notice of it at his peril. The district attorney may also go to the circuit prepared, though he receive no notice.

Such being the practice, this recognizance is forfeited; and liable to be estreated. But the defendant shows such cause against it, as would have warranted the judge in postponing the trial. Under the circumstances, let the motion to estreat be taken, unless the defendant renew his recognizance to try at the next circuit in 30 days.

Bronson suggested, that according to the English practice, the old recognizance continued in force, till the cause should be actually tried. y

Sutherland, J. There is some doubt of this upon our practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Levy
34 N.Y. Crim. 29 (New York Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Cow. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-winchell-nysupct-1827.