People v. Winch
This text of 26 A.D.3d 673 (People v. Winch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lawliss, J.), rendered November 17, 2004 in Clinton County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of sexual abuse in the first degree.
In satisfaction of a 26-count indictment, defendant waived his right to appeal and pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree. He was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to a prison term of four years followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Appellate counsel for defendant now seeks to be relieved of her assignment as counsel on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).
Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Spain, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 673, 808 N.Y.S.2d 913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-winch-nyappdiv-2006.