People v. Wilson

2025 NY Slip Op 01244
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 5, 2025
DocketInd. No. 70680/21
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 01244 (People v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wilson, 2025 NY Slip Op 01244 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Wilson (2025 NY Slip Op 01244)
People v Wilson
2025 NY Slip Op 01244
Decided on March 5, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 5, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P.
WILLIAM G. FORD
JANICE A. TAYLOR
JAMES P. MCCORMACK, JJ.

2022-10098
(Ind. No. 70680/21)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

James Wilson, appellant.


Bruce R. Bekritsky, Carle Place, NY, for appellant.

Anne T. Donnelly, District Attorney, Mineola, NY (David L. Glovin and John B. Latella III of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Howard E. Sturim, J.), rendered September 23, 2022, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing, voluntary, and intelligent, since he did not move to withdraw his plea on this ground or otherwise raise this issue before the County Court (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Abbott, 203 AD3d 840, 841). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record affirmatively demonstrates that the defendant's plea of guilty was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered (see People v Galicia, 231 AD3d 851, 852; People v Osorio-Rivera, 191 AD3d 902; see generally People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 382-383).

Since the defendant raises no other issues on appeal, his contentions regarding the validity of his appeal waiver are academic (see People v Galicia, 231 AD3d at 852).

IANNACCI, J.P., FORD, TAYLOR and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Osorio-Rivera
2021 NY Slip Op 01069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
People v. Abbott
203 A.D.3d 840 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 01244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilson-nyappdiv-2025.