People v. Wilson

2017 NY Slip Op 673, 147 A.D.3d 793, 45 N.Y.S.3d 800
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 1, 2017
Docket2014-02492
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 673 (People v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Wilson, 2017 NY Slip Op 673, 147 A.D.3d 793, 45 N.Y.S.3d 800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered March 4, 2014, convicting him of assault in the first degree and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), the People adduced legally sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s conviction of assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10 (3) beyond a reasonable doubt, as the evidence of the defendant’s conduct supported a finding of depraved indifference (see People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212 [2005]; People v Nelligan, 135 AD3d 1075, 1077-1078 [2016]; People v Nunez, 51 AD3d 1398, 1399 [2008]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the verdict is repugnant (see People v Carter, 7 NY3d 875, 876 [2006]; People v Brooks, 139 AD3d 1391, 1394 [2016]; People v Summerville, 138 AD3d 897, 898 [2016]). In any event, the verdict was not repugnant (see Matter of Suarez v Byrne, 10 NY3d 523, 541 [2008]; People v Trappier, 87 NY2d 55, 59 [1995]; Matter of Shalick M., 133 AD3d 413 [2015]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit.

Rivera, J.P., Roman, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Evans
2025 NY Slip Op 04189 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Wilson v. Lee
E.D. New York, 2019
People v. Wilson
32 N.Y.3d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 673, 147 A.D.3d 793, 45 N.Y.S.3d 800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilson-nyappdiv-2017.