People v. Wilson

309 A.D.2d 507, 765 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9992
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Wilson. Read the opinion of the Court — 283 A.D.2d 339

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), rendered July 8, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in precluding defendant’s attempt to impeach the arresting officer with an omission from a complaint report, since the purported inconsistency had no probative value under the circumstances (see People v Duncan, 46 NY2d 74, 80 [1978], cert denied 442 US 910 [1979]). Defendant received a full opportunity to attack the officer’s credibility, and there was no impairment of defendant’s right to confront witnesses and present a defense (see Delaware v Van Arsdall, 475 US 673, 678-679 [1986]).

Notwithstanding the comments by the court at sentencing, it is clear that the sentence was properly imposed and, in light of defendant’s criminal record and the facts underlying the crime of which he was convicted, we find no basis to disturb it. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Tom, Ellerin, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilson, 309 A.D.2d 507, 765 N.Y.S.2d 244, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

309 A.D.2d 507 (People v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delaware v. Van Arsdall
475 U.S. 673 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Duncan
385 N.E.2d 572 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)