People v. Wilson (Lamont)
This text of People v. Wilson (Lamont) (People v. Wilson (Lamont)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
against
Lamont Wilson, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered September 23, 2016, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of aggravated unlicensed driving in the third degree, and sentencing him to a $500 fine.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Ann E. Scherzer, J.), rendered September 23, 2016, affirmed.
We are unpersuaded that the bargained-for sentence imposed upon defendant's conviction for aggravated unlicensed driving - payment of a $500 fine - was unduly harsh or excessive, and find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Fair, 33 AD3d 558, 558 [2006], lv denied 8 NY3d 945 [2007]). The defendant was sentenced in accordance with his bargained-for plea and should not now "be heard to complain that he received what he bargained for" (id. at 558, quoting People v Chambers, 123 AD2d 270, 270 [1986]). Although defendant now claims that he is indigent, he never sought relief from the fine by way of a CPL 420.10(5) motion for re-sentencing (see People v Toledo, 101 AD3d 571 [2012], lv denied 21 NY3d 947 [2013]). Our disposition is without prejudice to such a motion being made by defendant.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: January 14, 2019
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
People v. Wilson (Lamont), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilson-lamont-nyappterm-2019.