People v. Wilson

California Court of Appeal

People v. Wilson

127 P. 1056, 20 Cal. App. 40, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 142

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 2, 1912

DocketCrim. No. 400.

StatusPublished

This text of 127 P. 1056 (People v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Wilson, 127 P. 1056, 20 Cal. App. 40, 1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 142 (Cal. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

KERRIGAN, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of robbery, and sentenced to imprisonment in the state prison for a term of twelve years. The appeal is from the judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The cause was on our last calendar for argument, and, when called, counsel for defendant failed to argue it, but obtained time within which to file a brief. No brief having been filed, and the time allowed therefor having expired, the court this day ordered the matter to be submitted for decision.

On examination of the record we find that no reporter’s transcript has been filed, and the time for such filing, under section 1247 of the Penal Code, or any extension thereof which could he granted under section 1247d of said code, has *41 long since elapsed. The appeal from the order denying the motion for a new trial cannot, therefore, be considered.

So far as the appeal from the judgment is concerned we have examined the judgment-roll, and find nothing therein which lends any support to the defendant in such appeal.

The judgment and order are accordingly affirmed.

Hall, J., and Lennon, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI