People v. Wilmot

208 A.D.2d 968, 617 N.Y.S.2d 882
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 1994·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Demakos, J.), imposed June 17, 1993, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree.

Ordered that the amended sentence is affirmed.

In imposing an amended sentence upon the defendant’s violation of probation, it was within the sentencing court’s discretion to direct that the sentence run consecutively to the term of imprisonment previously imposed in Nassau County (see, Penal Law § 70.25 [1]; People v Klein, 126 AD2d 670). Moreover, since the sentence of 1 to 3 years imprisonment which was imposed is the minimum lawful sentence for the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, a class D felony (see, Penal Law §§ 265.02, 70.02 [2] [b]; § 70.00 [2] [d]; [3], [4]), there exists no basis for concluding that the sentence was excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Ritter, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Wilmot, 208 A.D.2d 968, 617 N.Y.S.2d 882 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

208 A.D.2d 968 (People v. Wilmot) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brown
606 F. Supp. 2d 306 (E.D. New York, 2009)
People v. Chedick
246 A.D.2d 552 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Brewer
237 A.D.2d 453 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)