People v. Williford

49 A.D.3d 1241, 852 N.Y.2d 878
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williford. Read the opinion of the Court — 42 A.D.3d 507

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting [1242]*1242him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 220.16 [1]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, the record establishes that he voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]), and that valid waiver encompasses his challenge to the severity of the sentence (see People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; People u Burney, 41 AD3d 1221 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 863 [2007]). Present-Smith, J.P., Centra, Fahey, Peradotto and Green, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williford, 49 A.D.3d 1241, 852 N.Y.2d 878 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

49 A.D.3d 1241 (People v. Williford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lococo
699 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Kemp
724 N.E.2d 754 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)