People v. Williamson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Williamson

66 A.D.3d 802, 885 N.Y.S.2d 917

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.3d 802 (People v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williamson, 66 A.D.3d 802, 885 N.Y.S.2d 917 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), all rendered July 28, 2008, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree under indictment No. 08-00280, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 08-00314, and bail jumping in the second degree under indictment No. 08-00315, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

[803]*803Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by the defendant from three judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Cacace, J.), all rendered July 28, 2008, convicting him of attempted assault in the second degree under indictment No. 08-00280, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree under indictment No. 08-00314, and bail jumping in the second degree under indictment No. 08-00315, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

[803]*803Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Mastro, J.P., Dillon, Dickerson, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 802, 885 N.Y.S.2d 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williamson-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack