People v. Williamson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Williamson

25 A.D.2d 882, 271 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1966

StatusPublished

This text of 25 A.D.2d 882 (People v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williamson, 25 A.D.2d 882, 271 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered December 14, 1964, which, without a hearing, denied his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered March 16, 1962, convicting him (on two counts each) of selling narcotic drugs and of possession of narcotic drugs, upon a jury verdict, and [883]*883imposing sentence on the selling counts. The judgment was affirmed (21 A D 2d 752). Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing upon defendant’s application before a Judge other than the one before whom this case was tried. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, a hearing is required on the allegations contained in defendant’s affidavit in support of his application.

Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, entered December 14, 1964, which, without a hearing, denied his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered March 16, 1962, convicting him (on two counts each) of selling narcotic drugs and of possession of narcotic drugs, upon a jury verdict, and [883]*883imposing sentence on the selling counts. The judgment was affirmed (21 A D 2d 752). Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing upon defendant’s application before a Judge other than the one before whom this case was tried. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, a hearing is required on the allegations contained in defendant’s affidavit in support of his application.

Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Hill and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 A.D.2d 882, 271 N.Y.S.2d 599, 1966 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williamson-nyappdiv-1966.