People v. Williams

8 Daly 264
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 7, 1879
StatusPublished

This text of 8 Daly 264 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Williams, 8 Daly 264 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Opinion

Charles P. Daly, Chief Justice.

The judgment on the recognizance in this case must be discharged. The plaintiff, who gave the recognizance, was at the time of giving it a married woman. Her marriage was proved before the referee by the clergyman who celebrated it, and it is well settled that a married woman cannot be bound by a recognizance,' because it is not capable of being estreated. (Bennet v. Wilson, 3 M. & Selw. p. 1, per Le Blanc, J.; Petersdorf on Bail, 506.) Or, if capable, under the enabling acts, to enter into a recognizance as surety, she can only bind her separate estate, and that she does so must be expressed in the instrument. (Gosman v. Crugie, 69 N. Y. 87.)

Van Hoesen, J., concurred.

Judgment vacatéd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gosman v. . Cruger
69 N.Y. 87 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Daly 264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-nyctcompl-1879.