People v. Williams

New York Court of Common Pleas

People v. Williams

6 Daly 409

CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas

DecidedApril 3, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Daly 409 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williams, 6 Daly 409 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

The application to discharge the judgment on the forfeited recognizance must be supported by the proofs required in the cases of People v. Cary & Marsters (ante,p. 406), People v. Linkart, and other cases decided in this and previous general terms; certified copies of the recognizance, indictment,., order of forfeiture, and record of acquittal must be furnished, together with proofs that the prosecution has not suffered by the delay.

The application should be denied, with leave to renew.

Charles P. Daly, Oh. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concurred..

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J. F. Daly, J.

The application to discharge the judgment on the forfeited recognizance must be supported by the proofs required in the cases of People v. Cary & Marsters (ante,p. 406), People v. Linkart, and other cases decided in this and previous general terms; certified copies of the recognizance, indictment,., order of forfeiture, and record of acquittal must be furnished, together with proofs that the prosecution has not suffered by the delay.

The application should be denied, with leave to renew.

Charles P. Daly, Oh. J., and Van Hoesen, J., concurred..

Application denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Daly 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-nyctcompl-1876.

Opinion

J. F. Daly, J.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack