People v. Williams

2018 NY Slip Op 3037
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 A.D.3d 1522
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 2018·No. 571 KA 16-01618·Published

Opinion

People v Williams (2018 NY Slip Op 03037)
People v Williams
2018 NY Slip Op 03037
Decided on April 27, 2018
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 27, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

571 KA 16-01618

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JEREMIAH D. WILLIAMS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (MICHAEL S. DEAL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (SHIRLEY A. GORMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Michael F. Pietruszka, A.J.), rendered April 11, 2016. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of failure to register and/or verify status as a sex offender.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of failure to register and/or verify his status as a sex offender (Correction Law §§ 168-f [4]; 168-t). We reject defendant's contention that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. The record establishes that County Court "expressly ascertained from defendant that, as a condition of the plea, he was agreeing to waive his right to appeal, and the court did not conflate that right with those automatically forfeited by a guilty plea" (People v McCrea, 140 AD3d 1655, 1655 [4th Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 933 [2016] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Contrary to defendant's further contention, "the oral waiver of the right to appeal was buttressed by [his] written waiver of [the right to] appeal, which explicitly enumerated the rights that were to be relinquished and [in which defendant] acknowledged that [he] had discussed the consequences of the waiver with counsel' " (People v Gaines, — AD3d &mdash, &mdash, 2018 NY Slip Op 01740, *1 [4th Dept 2018]). The waiver encompasses defendant's challenge to the severity of his sentence (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Entered: April 27, 2018

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 2018 NY Slip Op 3037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 3037 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Gaines
2018 NY Slip Op 1740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. McCrea
140 A.D.3d 1655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)