People v. Williams

136 A.D.3d 701, 23 N.Y.S.3d 894
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 105 A.D.3d 1428
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2016·No. 2013-08605·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), dated July 18, 2013, convicting him of driving while ability impaired by alcohol, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court did not err in failing to grant the defendant’s motion for a missing witness charge, as the testimony of the subject witness would have been cumulative to the testimony of the other witnesses (see People v Savinon, 100 NY2d 192, 197 [2003]; People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428 [1986]).

*702 The defendant’s contention concerning the Supreme Court’s post-summation colloquy with the prosecutor is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit (see People v Issac, 121 AD3d 816, 816-817 [2014]).

Balkin, J.P., Chambers, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 136 A.D.3d 701, 23 N.Y.S.3d 894 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

136 A.D.3d 701 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Savinon
791 N.E.2d 401 (New York Court of Appeals, 2003)
People v. Issac
121 A.D.3d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Gonzalez
502 N.E.2d 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)