People v. Williams
113 A.D.3d 423, 977 N.Y.2d 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 A.D.3d 1576 →
Opinion
[424]*424Defendant’s challenge to the imposition of the mandatory surcharge should be raised in the sentencing court by way of a motion for resentencing at the end of a defendant’s incarceration (People v Bradley, 249 AD2d 103 [1st Dept 1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 923 [1998]). Consequently, defendant’s arguments to this Court are premature. Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Renwick, Manzanet-Daniels and Feinman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Williams, 113 A.D.3d 423, 977 N.Y.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 423 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Bradley
249 A.D.2d 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)