People v. Williams

94 A.D.3d 1527, 942 N.Y.S.2d 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 27, 2012·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered September 2, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]). As defendant correctly concedes, he failed to preserve for our review his contention that a conflict of interest between the probation officer who prepared the presentence report and a police officer at the scene of the arrest required the preparation of a new presentence report and resentencing (see CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present— Scudder, EJ., Fahey, Lindley and Martoche, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 94 A.D.3d 1527, 942 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

94 A.D.3d 1527 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Whaley
2022 NY Slip Op 03631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. Gibbons
101 A.D.3d 1615 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)