People v. Williams

67 A.D.3d 1426, 887 N.Y.S.2d 898
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 35 A.D.3d 971

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), rendered November 21, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree (Penal Law § 165.06). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying his request for an adjournment to enable him to procure a witness (see People v Moore, 41 AD3d 1149, 1151 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 879 [2007], reconsideration denied 9 NY3d 992 [2007]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his further contention that he was denied a fair trial based on prosecutorial misconduct (see CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, that contention lacks merit inasmuch as the alleged misconduct was not so egregious as to deprive defendant of a fair trial (see People v Shaw, 66 AD3d 1415 [2009]; see also People v Brent-Pridgen, 48 AD3d 1054, 1055 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 860 [2008]). Present—Martoche, J.P., Smith, Fahey, Carni and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 67 A.D.3d 1426, 887 N.Y.S.2d 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

67 A.D.3d 1426 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moore
41 A.D.3d 1149 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Brent-Pridgen
48 A.D.3d 1054 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)