People v. Williams

5 A.D.3d 407, 771 N.Y.S.2d 911
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 2004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), dated March 13, 2003, which denied his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h), to vacate a judgment of the same court rendered March 23, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

A motion to vacate a judgment of conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (h) cannot be made as a substitute for a direct appeal from the judgment when the defendant could have raised his claims on appeal, but failed to do so. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s motion on that ground (see People v Cooks, 67 NY2d 100, 104 [1986]; People v Kotler, 271 AD2d 548, 549 [2000]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 5 A.D.3d 407, 771 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 407 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Thomas
131 A.D.3d 551 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Dominique v. Artus
25 F. Supp. 3d 321 (E.D. New York, 2014)
People v. Smith
36 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Hall
28 A.D.3d 678 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)