Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Williams

People v. Williams

4 A.D.3d 441, 771 N.Y.S.2d 364
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 281 A.D.2d 933 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 9, 2004·Published

Opinion

by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered April 27, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree (three counts), assault in the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565 [2000]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; People v Groonell, 256 AD2d 356, 357 [1998]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P, Krausman, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 4 A.D.3d 441, 771 N.Y.S.2d 364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

4 A.D.3d 441 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Henry
744 N.E.2d 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Groonell
256 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)