People v. Williams
294 A.D.2d 312, 742 N.Y.S.2d 544, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5594
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 30, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the element of physical injury is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that by choking the victim and caus[313]*313ing him to lose consciousness, defendant inflicted physical injury (see, Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; People v Bogan, 70 NY2d 860, 862; People v Delph, 269 AD2d 218, lv denied 94 NY2d 947). Concur—Buckley, J.P., Rosenberger, Lerner, Rubin and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Williams, 294 A.D.2d 312, 742 N.Y.S.2d 544, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5594 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
294 A.D.2d 312 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Felipe
66 A.D.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)