People v. Williams

293 A.D.2d 394, 740 N.Y.S.2d 625, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4073
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 260 A.D.2d 651

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J., on dismissal motion; Michael Obús, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered August 1, 2000, convicting defendant of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of JVa to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Counsel’s failure to effectuate defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury did not constitute ineffective assistance. Contrary to defendant’s arguments, there is no basis upon which to distinguish this case from People v Wiggins (89 NY2d 872). Defendant’s claim of prejudice is farfetched and speculative. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 293 A.D.2d 394, 740 N.Y.S.2d 625, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4073 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

293 A.D.2d 394 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Wiggins
675 N.E.2d 845 (New York Court of Appeals, 1996)