People v. Williams

254 A.D.2d 41, 680 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9988
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 246

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered January 30, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the third degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 21/s to 7 years, IV3 to 4 years, and 1 year, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

The court appropriately exercised its discretion in granting the People’s request for a missing witness charge regarding defendant’s cousin, who would have been expected to provide material, noncumulative evidence favorable to defendant, since defendant failed to show that diligent efforts to produce the witness, including arranging for a babysitter, would have been unsuccessful (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 428).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 254 A.D.2d 41, 680 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 41 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzalez
502 N.E.2d 583 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)