People v. Williams

227 A.D.2d 509, 643 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5057
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 A.D.2d 986

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered June 9, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered, that the judgment is affirmed.

The record indicates that the police interaction with the defendant was justified in its inception and reasonably limited in scope at each step in response to the circumstances presented (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v De Bour, 40 NY2d [510]*510210; People v Marino, 212 AD2d 735; see also, People v Mar-tines, 80 NY2d 444; People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Ritter, J. P., Thompson, Hart and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 227 A.D.2d 509, 643 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 509 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Boodle
391 N.E.2d 1329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Martinez
606 N.E.2d 951 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)
People v. Marino
212 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)