People v. Williams

218 A.D.2d 767, 630 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8829

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 186 A.D.2d 161 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 21, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), imposed May 10, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; cf., People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

We have, however, examined the defendant’s contention that the sentence was excessive and find it to be without merit (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), imposed May 10, 1994.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Appellate review of the issue raised by the defendant was effectively waived by him as part of his plea bargain (see, People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1; cf., People v DeSimone, 80 NY2d 273, 282-283).

People v. Williams, 218 A.D.2d 767, 630 N.Y.S.2d 950, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8829 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

218 A.D.2d 767 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Seaberg

541 N.E.2d 1022 (New York Court of Appeals, 1989)

People v. Callahan

80 N.Y.2d 273 (New York Court of Appeals, 1992)

People v. Kazepis

101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Opinion

Related