People v. Williams

203 A.D.2d 815, 612 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4477
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 A.D.2d 448

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Zittell, J.), rendered December 4, 1992, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of two counts of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant, upon pleading guilty to two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 4 (ó to 9 years. On this appeal, defendant claims that his guilty plea was invalid and that his sentence amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.

A review of the record of the plea allocution reveals that defendant’s plea was knowing, voluntary and intelligent. Further, we find no support for defendant’s contention that the sentence imposed constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Finally, given that defendant pleaded guilty knowing that he would receive the sentence imposed, which was the most [816]*816lenient prison term possible, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 203 A.D.2d 815, 612 N.Y.S.2d 973, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4477 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

203 A.D.2d 815 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.