People v. Williams

135 A.D.2d 593, 522 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 A.D.2d 767

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), rendered August 5, 1985, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant claims that the Trial Judge erred by permitting the complainant to "bolster” his testimony by stating that he had received training in observation. "However, this was not impermissible 'bolstering’, but, rather, was information which the jury could consider in their evaluation of his testimony” (People v Williams, 109 AD2d 906, 908).

We have considered the defendant’s other claimed errors and find that they are either unpreserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05), or harmless (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 135 A.D.2d 593, 522 N.Y.S.2d 32, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

135 A.D.2d 593 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Crimmins
326 N.E.2d 787 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Galloway
430 N.E.2d 885 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Williams
109 A.D.2d 906 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)