People v. Williams

41 A.D.2d 611, 340 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5139
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 13, 1973·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 14, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the case remanded to Trial. Term, Supreme Court, Bronx County, for trial anew. Though, the District Attorney claims that the record does not establish that the'trial coni* refused to permit inquiry of prospective jurors on the voir dire as to possible prejudice against members of the defendant-appellant’s race, this-does/appear without dispute. That ruling is in direct conflict with the recent holding of the United States Supreme Court in Ham v. South Carolina (409 U. S. 524). Although there was strong evidence of, defendant’s guilt, the error requires reversal of. the judgment and a new trial. If we did not reverse for the reason stated, we would have, in any event, modified the sentence of two consecutive 15-year terms as excessive. Concur-r-McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez and Murphy, JJ.; Kupferman, J., concurs in the following memorandum: While I concur in the opinion of this court (cf. Matter of Mack v. Davidson, 40 A D 2d 641) the apt citation with regard to excessiveness of sentence is section 70.30 (subd. [1], par. [c]) of the Penal Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 41 A.D.2d 611, 340 N.Y.S.2d 504, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

41 A.D.2d 611 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rentz
120 Misc. 2d 165 (New York County Courts, 1983)
State v. Long
348 A.2d 202 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
James Ross, Jr. v. Theodore Ristaino
508 F.2d 754 (First Circuit, 1974)