People v. Williams

40 A.D.2d 690, 336 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 10, 1972·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 18, 1971, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree and other crimes, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Although there was strong evidence of defendant’s guilt, nevertheless the Trial Judge’s disparagement, a number of times during the trial and in the jury’s presence, of the manner in which defendant’s assigned counsel was conducting himself in the course of his defense and representation of defendant, and the Trial Judge’s express and inferential disparagement of the defense asserted by defendant, in our opinion require a reversal of the judgment and a new trial (cf. People v. Mendes, 3 N Y 2d 120, 121; People v. Adler, 274 App. Div. 820; People v. Rafkind, 254 App. Div. 742; People v. Kilroe, 201 App. Div. 549, 556; People v. Kenny, 20 A D 2d 578, 579; People v. Di Carlo, 242 App. Div. 328). Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 40 A.D.2d 690, 336 N.Y.S.2d 267, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

40 A.D.2d 690 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Johns
69 A.D.2d 843 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
State v. Pokini
526 P.2d 94 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1974)