People v. Williams

28 A.D.2d 1080, 285 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3215
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 A.D.2d 821

Opinion

Memorandum: Following a hearing upon the petition of the defendants in a coram nobis proceeding pursuant to People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) the court found the oral admissions and written confessions in issue to be voluntary without a specification of finding of voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt. It appears that in a preliminary determination by memorandum dated January 4, 1966, the hearing Judge held that “ the burden is upon the defendants to initially establish their contentions and thereafter the ultimate burden of establishing that the confessions are voluntary beyond a reasonable doubt will rest on the People To the extent that the court imposed a burden on the defendants to establish their contentions it was in error. The matter is remitted to the County Court solely for a decision upon the testimony presented at the hearing as to whether the People have proven voluntariness beyond a reasonable doubt. (Appeal from order of Onondaga. County Court denying, following a hearing, motion to vacate [1081]*1081judgments of conviction for robbery first degree rendered December 27, 1960.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Williams, 28 A.D.2d 1080, 285 N.Y.S.2d 891, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

28 A.D.2d 1080 (People v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.