People v. Williams

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Williams

372 N.E.2d 328, 43 N.Y.2d 725, 401 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2522

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 21, 1977

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 372 N.E.2d 328 (People v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Williams, 372 N.E.2d 328, 43 N.Y.2d 725, 401 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2522 (N.Y. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the majority in that court that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction for possession of a weapon. Police attention had been drawn to defendant’s behavior about 3:50 a.m. on December 20. He was observed to crouch down beside the left front wheel of the Volkswagen van, to take something from beneath his overcoat and to place it under the front wheel. When defendant proceeded a short distance down the street to the corner, one of the officers went immediately to the spot where defendant had been and found the sawed-off shotgun under the left front wheel. There was nothing else under the wheel and no one else in the area.

*727 Proof of such circumstances supports the conclusion that defendant had been in possession of the sawed-off shotgun.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

We agree with the majority in that court that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction for possession of a weapon. Police attention had been drawn to defendant’s behavior about 3:50 a.m. on December 20. He was observed to crouch down beside the left front wheel of the Volkswagen van, to take something from beneath his overcoat and to place it under the front wheel. When defendant proceeded a short distance down the street to the corner, one of the officers went immediately to the spot where defendant had been and found the sawed-off shotgun under the left front wheel. There was nothing else under the wheel and no one else in the area.

*727 Proof of such circumstances supports the conclusion that defendant had been in possession of the sawed-off shotgun.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

372 N.E.2d 328, 43 N.Y.2d 725, 401 N.Y.S.2d 487, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-ny-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack