People v. Williams (Kai)
This text of 73 Misc. 3d 133(A) (People v. Williams (Kai)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
People v Williams (2021 NY Slip Op 51020(U)) [*1]
| People v Williams (Kai) |
| 2021 NY Slip Op 51020(U) [73 Misc 3d 133(A)] |
| Decided on October 21, 2021 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on October 21, 2021
PRESENT: : TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, P.J., JERRY GARGUILO, TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL, JJ
2018-2576 S CR
against
Kai Williams, Appellant.
Feldman and Feldman (Steven A. Feldman of counsel), for appellant. Suffolk County District Attorney (Nicole L. Gallo of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Suffolk County, First District (Edward J. Hennessey, J.), rendered November 20, 2018. The judgment convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of harassment in the second degree, and imposed sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Following a nonjury trial, defendant was convicted of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]). Viewing the evidence at trial in the light most favorable to the prosecution (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 53-54 [1989]; People v Todaro, 26 NY2d 325 [1970]).
Under the particular circumstances of this case, including the threat that defendant made when she told complainant, a store manager, that she "know[s] people in this town that can f**k [her] up," and defendant's aggressive and hostile conduct of pushing store items off the cashier's counter directed at the complainant, the People established the elements of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]) beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
RUDERMAN, P.J., GARGUILO and DRISCOLL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 21, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 Misc. 3d 133(A), 2021 NY Slip Op 51020(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-williams-kai-nyappterm-2021.