People v. William G.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. William G.

251 A.D.2d 825, 675 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7429

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 251 A.D.2d 825 (People v. William G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. William G., 251 A.D.2d 825, 675 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered April 21, 1997, which sentenced defendant upon his adjudication as a youthful offender.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of both the record and defense counsel’s brief leads to the same conclusion. The record demonstrates that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to grand larceny in the fourth degree. Furthermore, defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender and sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years in accordance with the plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., White, Peters, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Buckley, J.), rendered April 21, 1997, which sentenced defendant upon his adjudication as a youthful offender.

Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Our review of both the record and defense counsel’s brief leads to the same conclusion. The record demonstrates that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty to grand larceny in the fourth degree. Furthermore, defendant was adjudicated a youthful offender and sentenced to a prison term of 1 to 3 years in accordance with the plea agreement. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see, People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979, lv denied 67 NY2d 650).

Cardona, P. J., White, Peters, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 A.D.2d 825, 675 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-william-g-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack