People v. Willette

30 A.D.3d 849, 820 N.Y.S.2d 530

This text of 30 A.D.3d 849 (People v. Willette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Willette, 30 A.D.3d 849, 820 N.Y.S.2d 530 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

Peters J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Franklin County (Main, Jr., J.), entered January 14, 2005, which classified defendant as a risk level III sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.

Defendant appeared before County Court for a hearing to redetermine his sex offender risk level, pursuant to the stipulation of settlement in Doe v Pataki (3 F Supp 2d 456 [1998]). He appeared pro se, and his request to be excused from the hearing [850]*850was granted. In accordance with the risk assessment instrument that had been submitted to the court, defendant was determined to be a risk level III sex offender. He now appeals, asserting, among other things, errors relating to his waivers of the right to counsel and to be present at the hearing. He seeks a new redetermination hearing, which the People do not oppose.

Crew III, J.P., Mugglin, Rose and Lathinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the facts, and matter remitted to the County Court of Franklin County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe v. Pataki
3 F. Supp. 2d 456 (S.D. New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.D.3d 849, 820 N.Y.S.2d 530, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-willette-nyappdiv-2006.