People v. Wilkinson
This text of 197 A.D.2d 872 (People v. Wilkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Following defendant’s admission that defendant violated the terms of his probation, County Court properly sentenced him to a term of incarceration without first ordering an updated pre-sentence investigation report. Although an updated report is normally required, the record reveals that, prior to resentencing defendant, County Court received periodic reports, as well as a misconduct report, from the Probation Department. Consequently, County Court was fully familiar with any changes in defendant’s status, conduct, or condition since the original report was prepared and an updated pre-sentence report was not required (see, People v LaLonde, 178 AD2d 944, 945; People v Sanchez, 143 AD2d 377, lv denied 73 NY2d 790; People v Brand, 138 AD2d 966, 967, lv denied 71 NY2d 966; People v Jackson, 106 AD2d 93, 98). (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Mulroy, J.—Violation of Probation.) Present—Denman, P. J., Balio, Lawton, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 A.D.2d 872, 604 N.Y.S.2d 872, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-wilkinson-nyappdiv-1993.